Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 925 F.2d 160 - Borman's, Inc. v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'n

Borman's, Inc. v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'n’s Empirical Analysis

925 F.2d 160 · 1991

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
5
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2016

7 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

150199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Weinberger v. Salfi · United States v. Carolene Products Co. · Vance v. Bradley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The burden upon a party seeking to overturn a legislative enactment for irrationally discriminating between groups under the equal protection clause is an extremely heavy one.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “excludes from the definition of covered claims, ‘obligations to . . . a person who has a net worth greater than 1/10 of 1% of the aggregate premiums written by member insurers in this state in the preceding calendar year.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “purpose of the net worth calculation was to ensure that the Association’s limited funds go to those insureds who are least able to absorb an unexpected loss due to the insolvency of an insurer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.