Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 925 F.2d 330 - Tucker v. Carlson

Tucker v. Carlson’s Empirical Analysis

925 F.2d 330 · 1991

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
June 2021
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably McIntosh v. United States Parole Commission (1997), Benny v. United States Parole Commission (2002)

39 federal appellate · 5 district ·

4701991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · In re Disbarment of Johnson · Gozlon-Peretz v. United States · Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. · Ybarra v. Reno Thunderbird Mobile Home Village

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a federal prisoner is [generally] required to exhaust [her] federal administrative remedies before filing a habeas petition.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[T]here is no statutory provision that accords a prisoner credit against a federal sentence for time served in a state prison on a state charge,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to determine whether [Silveyra] satisfied the requirement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.