Banta v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
925 F.2d 343 · 1991
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2017
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Califano v. Sanders · Weinberger v. Salfi · Bowen v. City of New York · Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Weintraub
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“equities in favor of tolling the limitations period [that] are 'so great that deference to the agency's judgment is inappropriate.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the sixty day period is not jurisdictional, but is instead a statute of limitations which the Secretary may waive.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“neither invited submission of additional materials nor enticed her to forgo filing a complaint in district court. " Id. Relying on Triplett, Friddle, and Biron , we noted: 31 A rule allowing claimants to extend their time for filing in district court simply by submitting additional materials which the Appeals Council considers when determining whether to reopen a case would frustrate Congress's intent "to limit judicial review to the original decision denying benefits [and thereby] forestall repetitive or belated litigation of stale eligibility claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.