Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 925 F.2d 359 - United States v. Willis

United States v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis

925 F.2d 359 · 1991

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
August 2022
most recently cited

27 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably United States v. Concepcion (1992), United States v. Corbin (1993)

27 federal appellate ·

2801991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3551 (Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on United States v. Lanza · United States v. Perez · United States v. Madewell · United States v. Smith · United States v. Shinners

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Congress has not, through the cross reference clause, federalized a state crime. Instead, the cross reference merely allows the sentence for the charged crime ... to reflect the reality of the crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that he be sentenced according to such other offense conduct even though his conviction is only for the unlawful possession of firearms.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[W]e think it obvious that the culpability--and the resultant punishment--of a person who passively possesses a gun is different than the person who possesses that same gun but also uses it in a drive-by shooting.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.