Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 925 F.2d 56 - United States v. Cea

United States v. Cea’s Empirical Analysis

925 F.2d 56 · 1991

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
January 2001
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3742

Relies on American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · United States v. Parker · United States v. Shoulberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no suggestion in the commentaries that loss was intended to be limited to the harm done by the defendant when, for some reason, the amount taken exceeded the harm suffered by the victim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.