Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 925 F.2d 779 - United States v. Morrow

United States v. Morrow’s Empirical Analysis

925 F.2d 779 · 1991

Citation profile

122
cited by 122 later decisions
7
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

75 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 122 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably United States v. Saucedo (1991), United States v. Kopp (1991)

75 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

990199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1114 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Miller v. Florida · Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · Simon v. United States · United States v. Suarez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 122 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “during the course of the offense or immediate flight therefrom.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “--is injured or targeted by the offense of being a felon in possession of a firearm, the adjustment set forth in Sec. 3A1.2(a) does not apply to that offense. 2 22 I should note that the majority is correct in stating that the adjustment set forth in Subdivision (b) of Sec. 3A1.2 can be applied in a felon-in-possession case. That provision, unlike Subdivision (a), does not require that the offense of conviction have a”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a witness need not physically point out a defendant so long as the evidence is sufficient to permit the inference that the person on trial was the person who committed the crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.