Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

925 F.2d 827

Docket No. 89-4095.

Young v. Herring

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-02-26

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1993

3 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Relies on Young v. Herring · United States v. Shaid

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-02-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Prof. Henry Gabriel, Loyola University Law School, New Orleans, La. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant.

Jerry Lynn Young, Parchman, Miss., pro se.

Marvin L. White, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Charlene R. Pierce, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mike Moore, Atty. Gen., Jackson, Miss., for respondents-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi; L.T. Senter, Jr., Judge.

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 6, 1990, 5 Cir., 1990, 917 F.2d 858)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

¶1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/925/f2d/827 · .json · Public domain