Hurlburt v. Black’s Empirical Analysis
925 F.3d 154 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1321 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 506
Relies on Almendarez-Torres v. United States · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. · Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. · Nobelman v. American Savings Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen ... the most natural reading of statutory language supports a particular construction of that language, courts should be wary of adopting an alternative construction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.