Stiley v. Block’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 103 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 128 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Swartz v. KPMG LLP (2007), State v. Varga (2004)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 103 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 114 Wash. 2d 907 - Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. Kallevig · 100 Wash. 2d 581 - Bowers v. Transamerica Title Insurance · 84 Wash. 2d 239 - King v. City of Seattle · 119 Wash. 2d 251 - Hizey v. Carpenter · 110 Wash. 2d 415 - Hoffer v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 128 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) representation of an existing fact; (2) materiality; (3) falsity; (4) the speaker's knowledge of its falsity; (5) intent of the speaker that it should be acted upon by the plaintiff; (6) plaintiff's ignorance of its falsity; (7) plaintiff's reliance on the truth of the representation; (8) plaintiff's right to rely upon it; and (9) damages suffered by the plaintiff.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is inappropriate only when it is clear that the evidence and reasonable inferences are insufficient to support the jury's verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A trial court is required to instruct the jury on a theory only where there is substantial evidence to support it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hill v. Cox
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.