Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 925 P2D 237 - Lacey v. Lacey

Lacey v. Lacey’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2023

10 state decisions

601996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Oetjen v. Central Leather Co. · Underhill v. Hernandez · Fuller v. State · Marquiss v. Marquiss · Furman v. Rural Electric Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.