State v. Labrum’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2016
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Indelicato v. United States · Bullock v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. · Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc. · Clarke v. West Virginia Board of Regents · State v. Verde
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“on a pragmatic level, ... courts are not required to constantly survey or second-guess the nonobjecting party's best interests or trial strategy[,]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. J.C. v. State · J.C. v. State“particularly obvious or egregious and would serve no conceivable strategic purpose,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. J.C. v. State · J.C. v. State“`an opportunity to address a claimed error and, if appropriate, correct it.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.