925 So. 2d 284 - Castillo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Blockburger v. United States · Grady v. Corbin · McGee v. County of Orange · Wright v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘The right of a defendant to have counsel present at arraignment is a jurisdictional prerequisite to a conviction.’ Weakley v. State, 721 So.2d 235, 236 (Ala.1998) (citing Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938); Stokes v. Singletary, 952 F.2d 1567 (11th Cir.1992)). Thus, this claim is not subject to any of the procedural bars provided in Rule 32.2, Ala. R.Crim. P.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Robinson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.