Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 925 So. 2d 34 - State v. Rose

925 So. 2d 34 - State v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Huddleston v. United States · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · Local 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Schoonover · Jirovec v. Wood · Zelman v. Simmons-Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clearly express the vicious, deviant attitude that [defendant] holds toward women with whom he has a romantic relationship. This attitude is so similarly reflected in each of the crimes that [defendant] has committed that crimes are inextricably connected in the pattern . . . they exhibit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “the similarities between Ms. Rose's murder and the other crimes that [defendant] was previously charged with are not substantially similar to the crime in the case at bar.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.