Boudot v. Boudot’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · 696 So. 2d 697 - Rosen v. Rosen · 381 So. 2d 349 - Gibson v. Buice · Fisher v. John Carter and Associates, Inc. · 845 So. 2d 296 - Wentworth v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) Enlargement. When an act is required or allowed to be done at or within a specified time by these rules, by order of court, or by notice given thereunder, for cause shown the court at any time in its discretion . . . (2) on motion made and notice after the expiration of the specified period may permit the act to be done when failure to act was the result of excusable neglect. The court under this rule may not extend the time for serving a motion for rehearing or to enlarge any period of time governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“excusable neglect 'contemplate[s] that the courts would be permitted, where appropriate, to accept late filings caused by inadvertence, mistake, or carelessness, as well as by intervening circumstances beyond the party's control.' " Carter v. Lake County, 840 So. 2d 1153, 1157-58 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (alteration in original) (quoting Pioneer Inv. Servs. Co. v. Brunswick Assocs. Ltd. P'ship, 507 U.S. -4- 380, 388 (1993), and rejecting a "more stringent excusable neglect standard for rule 1.090(b)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“courts are inclined to find excusable neglect 'when the error occurs due to a breakdown in the mechanical or operational practices of the attorney's office equipment or staff.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.