Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

925 So. 2d 484

Docket No. 4D04-4201.

Baker v. State

Robert T. BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-04-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2006

1 state decisions

Relies on Valle v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-04-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

¶2Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3*485 SHAHOOD, J.

¶4We affirm appellant's, Robert Baker, conviction following a trial by jury. Appellant was charged with aggravated stalking, burglary of a conveyance with battery, throwing a deadly missile into a vehicle, and aggravated assault. The jury found appellant guilty of burglary of a conveyance, a lesser included offense to the burglary of a conveyance with battery charge.

¶5The judgment entered by the trial court reads that appellant was tried and found guilty of "Burglary Conv/Batt," meaning burglary of a conveyance with battery. Appellee acknowledges, and we agree, that the case should be remanded to correct this scrivener's error in the judgment to reflect that the jury found appellant guilty of burglary of a conveyance. See Valle v. State,756 So.2d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Appellant must not be present to correct this scrivener's error.

¶6Affirmed; Remanded with Directions.

¶7POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

/925/so2d/484 · .json · Public domain