925 So. 2d 577 - State v. Handy’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Bostick · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Delgado · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · 626 So. 2d 707 - State v. Tucker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) her knowledge of the shed burglaries in the area; 2) Handy's presence next to the lawnmower with a bicycle and attached dolly; 3) Handy's inability to identify the owner of the lawnmower; 3) Handy's explanation that the lawnmower was left for trash when there was no other trash around; 4) Handy's inability to provide identification or readily provide a name; and 5) Handy's nervous and fidgety behavior.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“support of its argument applies to district court rulings made at trial instead of at pre-trial motion practice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gillis“Moreover, the record indicates that the State failed to make a contemporaneous objection to Handy's Crosby plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gillis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.