Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 925 So. 2d 599 - State v. Hunter

925 So. 2d 599 - State v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Cortez · 441 So. 2d 1195 - State v. Belton · 842 So. 2d 330 - State v. Thompson · 602 So. 2d 914 - Florida Bar re: Advisory Opinion · State v. Nogess

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In State v. Scull, 93-2360, p. 9 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/30/94), 639 So.2d 1239, 1245 , this court stated: "The trial court is vested with great discretion when ruling on motion to suppress." See also State v. Jones, XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 4 Cir. 11/6/02), 832 So.2d 382 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.