Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 925 So. 2d 727 - State v. Lawrence

925 So. 2d 727 - State v. Lawrence’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Batson v. Kentucky · Chimel v. California · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · New York v. Belton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness: [[Image here]] (2) Excited utterance. A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Subject to the supervision of the attorney general, as provided by Article 62, the district attorney has entire charge and control of every criminal prosecution instituted or pending in the district, and determines whom, when, and how he will prosecute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The argument shall be confined to evidence admitted, to the lack of evidence, to conclusions of fact that the state or defendant may draw therefrom, and to the law applicable to the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.