925 So. 2d 797 - Flora v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

60 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “a defendant's substantive or fundamental rights are affected.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Eric Darrell Lott v. State of Mississippi · 991 So. 2d 179 - Baskin v. State

2. “inflammatory, highly prejudicial, or reasonably calculated to unduly influence the jury.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 951 So. 2d 575 - Shanks v. State · 963 So. 2d 1193 - Keys v. State

3. “The defendant must prove: (a) that the State possessed evidence favorable to the defendant (including impeachment evidence); (b) that the defendant does not possess the evidence nor could he obtain it himself with any reasonable diligence; (c) that the prosecution suppressed the favorable evidence; and (d) *Page 1030 that had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, a reasonable probability exists that the outcome of the proceedings would have been different.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hendrix v. State