925 So. 2d 840 - Johns v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
December 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Leatherwood v. State · 584 So. 2d 426 - Mohr v. State · 660 So. 2d 961 - Hiter v. State · 524 So. 2d 313 - Cabello v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“refuted each of these allegations, although he was unable to remember many of the details concerning his representation of Johns. The circuit court judge's decision to hold Johns's counsel to be effective was based largely on credibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Johns's attorney indicated that he had a very good reason for declining to interview these particular witnesses . . . . he believed the witnesses testimony was perjured testimony, based on the information Johns gave his attorney.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Schmitt, 560 So.2d at 154 ( quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ). To show reasonable probability, the mover must merely show”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.