Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
43 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bronson v. Schulten · 554 So. 2d 313 - Trotter v. State · 556 So. 2d 1062 - Vittitoe v. State · McDaniel v. State · Boddie v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not prohibit the imposition of post[-]release supervision upon a prior[-]convicted felon.” Johnson v. State, 925 So.2d 86, 105 (¶ 39) (Miss.2006). 3 .”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Goudy v. State · Reese v. State“[Wjhile both probation and the suspension of sentence involve the trial court’s discretionary and conditional release of a convict from the service of a sentence within the penal system, a probationary sentence is served under the supervision of probation officers, whereas a suspended sentence is served without such supervision, but on such legal terms and conditions as are required by the sentencing judge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) supervised probation may not be imposed on a convicted felon while post-release supervision may be imposed on a convicted felon; and, (2) supervised probation is limited to five years while post-release supervision is not.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.