Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 926 A2D 557 - In Re Packard

In Re Packard’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Little Appeal · 54 Pa. Commw. 561 - Mattei v. Huray · Pocopson Road · Emig v. Bobst Mountain Hunting Club · 332 Pa. Super. 264 - Pope v. Muth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is limited to ascertaining the validity of the Board's jurisdiction, the regularity of proceedings, questions of law and whether the Board abused its discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.