Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1991.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-03-28

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1994

6 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on 745 F. Supp. 710 - Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1991-03-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1E. Freeman Leverett, Heard, Leverett, Adams and Phelps, P.C., Elberton, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

¶2 *1574Carl R. Woodward, III, Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecehi & Stewart, Roseland, N.J. and Peter J. Anderson, Peterson, Dillard, Young Self & Asselin, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.

¶3Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, DUBINA, Circuit Judge, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the district court’s dispositive opinion, which is reported as Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc., 745 F.Supp. 710 (M.D.Ga.1990).

¶6AFFIRMED.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Judges

Gerald Bard Tjoflat
Chief Judge
Joel Fredrick Dubina
Chief Judge
PER CURIAM.
By the court
Read opinion →

Counsel

E. Freeman Leverett, Heard, Leverett, Adams and Phelps, P.C., Elberton, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Carl R. Woodward, III, Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecehi & Stewart, Roseland, N.J. and Peter J. Anderson, Peterson, Dillard, Young Self & Asselin, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.