Olivetti Office Usa Inc v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
926 F.2d 181 · 1991
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably Torrington Extend-A-Care Employee Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board (1994), Manhattan Eye Ear & Throat Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board (1991)
27 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Ford Motor Company v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Truitt Manufacturing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he courts of appeals have been charged by congress with “responsibility for the reasonableness and fairness of Labor Board decisions”, and if we were simply to ignore the effects of administrative delay, we would abandon this important supervisory responsibility. Therefore, while NLRB orders are normally “subject to limited judicial review”, we must withhold enforcement of orders that will not effectuate any reasonable policy of the act....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“True it is that an employer may sometimes refuse access to relevant information for reasons of confidentiality. Before recognizing such a right, however, the court must first determine that the union's right to relevant information is outweighed by the employer's legitimate claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“we have the authority to modify an order to ensure that it... effectuate[s] [the Act's] policies. Where the Board's order is insufficiently 'tailored to the unfair labor practice it is intended to redress,' or is unduly burdensome on the employer, it may be modified.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.