United States v. Coco’s Empirical Analysis
926 F.2d 759 · 1991
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Bruton v. United States · Bourjaily v. United States · Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission · Porter v. States · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Bell requires district courts to admit conditionally the hearsay statements of alleged co-conspirators, subject to a final on-the-record ruling that the statement is admissible under the co-conspirator exception to the rule against hearsay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“where the hearsay statement is otherwise admissible under Rule 801(d)(2)(E).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.