Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 926 F.2d 792 - United States v. Foreman

United States v. Foreman’s Empirical Analysis

926 F.2d 792 · 1990

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably United States v. Williamson (1995), United States v. Ajiboye (1992)

55 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

690199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein D Stanton · Caminetti v. United States · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the defendant abused a position of public or private trust, or used a special skill, in a manner that significantly facilitated the commission or concealment of the offense, increase by 2 levels.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[P]olice officers are accorded public trust to enforce the law. The public, including fellow law enforcement agents, expect that police officers will not violate the laws they are charged with enforcing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whether an abuse of a position of trust must implicate a special privilege accorded someone in [the defendant's] position.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.