Cole v. Tansy’s Empirical Analysis
926 F.2d 955 · 1991
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2023
15 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Barefoot v. Estelle · Herring v. New York · Kemp v. Potts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness: Hs * * sfc * * (2) Excited Utterance. A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“speculat[ion] about possible fabrication by [a witness when n]o evidence had been presented at trial to support this allegation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A district court has broad discretion in limiting the scope of closing arguments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.