Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 926 P2D 1158 - D'ANTORIO v. State

D'ANTORIO v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · South Dakota v. Opperman · Colorado v. Bertine · Illinois v. Lafayette · Florida v. Wells

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[AJn inventory search must not be a ruse for a general rummaging in order .to discover incriminating evidence. The policy or practice governing inventory searches should be designed to produce an inventory. The individual police officer must not be allowed so much latitude that inventory searches are turned into "a purposeful and general means of discovering evidence of crime[.] 4”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.