Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 926 P2D 116 - People v. Lanari

People v. Lanari’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2024

22 state decisions

1101996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · Taylor v. Illinois · Wilson v. People · People v. Ibarra · Walker v. People

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]ven though he could have decided the motion ... he, nevertheless, acting out of an abundance of caution, requested that the chief judge rule on this motion”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a judge's rulings on issues presented in prior proceedings, even if erroneous, are insufficient by themselves to demonstrate disqualifying bias or prejudice”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “so undermined the basic fairness of the trial as to cast serious doubt on the reliability of the conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.