In Re Worthen’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Valcarce v. Fitzgerald (1998), Bailey v. Bayles (2002)
51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Screws v. United States · Spies v. United States · United Steelworkers of America v. Weber · State v. Pena · In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 Peoples
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[tlimely and adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard in a meaningful way.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“'due process is not a technical conception with a fixed content unrelated to time, place, and cireum-stances”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]e will not overturn the Commission’s findings of fact unless they are arbitrary, capricious, or plainly in error, but we reserve the right to draw inferences from the basic facts which may differ from the Commission’s inferences and grant no deference to the Commission’s ultimate decision as to what constitutes an appropriate sanction.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Young · In Re McCully
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.