Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 926 SO2D 1241 - Renaud v. State

Renaud v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fitzpatrick v. State · 864 So. 2d 1257 - Berthiaume v. State · Morales v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Correction. A court may at any time correct an illegal sentence imposed by it, or an incorrect calculation made by it in a sentencing scoresheet, or a sentence that does not grant proper credit for time served when it is affirmatively alleged that the court records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to that relief, provided that a party may not file a motion to correct an illegal sentence under this subdivision during the time allowed for the filing of a motion under subdivision (b)(1) or during the pendency of a direct appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When the alleged illegality of the sentence is not apparent on the face of the record, a rule 3.850 motion is the only available remedy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.