Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Ring v. Arizona · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Zant v. Stephens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]his Court has `rejected the claim that the death penalty system is unconstitutional as being arbitrary and capricious because it fails to limit the class of persons eligible for the death penalty.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“this Court has repeatedly rejected claims that the standard jury instruction impermissibly shifts the burden to the defense to prove that death is not the appropriate sentence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[c]laims challenging the constitutionality of Florida's capital sentencing procedures [to] be raised at trial and on direct appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.