Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 926 SO2D 1243 - Miller v. State

Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Ring v. Arizona · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Zant v. Stephens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]his Court has `rejected the claim that the death penalty system is unconstitutional as being arbitrary and capricious because it fails to limit the class of persons eligible for the death penalty.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “this Court has repeatedly rejected claims that the standard jury instruction impermissibly shifts the burden to the defense to prove that death is not the appropriate sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[c]laims challenging the constitutionality of Florida's capital sentencing procedures [to] be raised at trial and on direct appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.