926 So. 2d 475 - Moorer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 573 So. 2d 284 - Holton v. State · 926 So. 2d 1139 - State v. Frierson · Gillman v. State · 458 So. 2d 350 - Hubler v. State · 371 So. 2d 148 - Gallucci v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This case, quite honestly, should have never been tried, but it was tried because [the defendant] wanted it tried. I don’t get it. We’ve got hundreds of cases that are set for trial,” and that [the defendant] “didn’t have enough integrity to step up and accept responsibility, ... we tried a case that should have been resolved on docket day”“without a trial.” Before pronouncing sentence, the trial judge told [the defendant’s wife] that her husband had “put you and your family and friends [through] having to come up here and ... you’re going to suffer because of what he did and because he wasn’t man enough to step up.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Walek v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.