926 So. 2d 867 - Windmon v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State · 466 So. 2d 833 - Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Miss. v. Campbell · 501 So. 2d 377 - Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. v. Pittman · 654 So. 2d 1122 - Terrain Enterprises, Inc. v. Mockbee · Universal Life Ins. Co. v. Veasley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] trial court should submit an issue to the jury only if the evidence creates a question of fact concerning which reasonable jurors could disagree.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“This Court will consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the appellee, giving that party the benefit of all favorable inference that may be reasonably drawn from the evidence. If the facts so considered point so overwhelmingly in favor of the appellant that reasonable men could not have arrived at a contrary verdict, we are required to reverse and render. On the other hand if there is substantial evidence in support of the verdict, that is, evidence of such quality and weight that reasonable and fair minded jurors in the exercise of impartial judgment might have reached different conclusions, affirmance is required. The above standards of review, however, are predicated on the fact that the trial judge applied the correct law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“The plaintiffs burden in proving a claim for bad faith refusal goes beyond proving mere negligence in performing the investigation. The level of negligence in conducting the investigation must be such that a proper investigation by the insurer would easily adduce evidence showing its defenses to be without merit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.