Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 927 F.2d 1156 - Drake v. City of Fort Collins

Drake v. City of Fort Collins’s Empirical Analysis

927 F.2d 1156 · 1991

Citation profile

262
cited by 262 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

86 federal appellate · 108 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 262 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Kendrick v. Penske Transportation Services, Inc. (2000), Randle v. City of Aurora (1995)

86 federal appellate · 108 district · 1 state decisions

1470199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1986 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Haines v. Kerner · International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 262 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Despite the liberal construction afforded pro se pleadings, the court will not construct arguments or theories for the plaintiff in the absence of any discussion of those issues.”
    25 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Cases establish that, in racial discrimination suits, the elements of a plaintiff's case are the same, based on the disparate treatment elements outlined in McDonnell Douglas, whether that case is brought under §§ 1981 or 1983 or Title VII.... Because the plaintiff's Title VII disparate treatment and disparate impact claims failed, so would his claims under §§ 1981 and 1983.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the necessary premise of the disparate impact approach is that some [housing] practices, adopted without a deliberately discriminatory motive, may in operation be functionally equivalent to intentional discrimination.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.