Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 927 F.2d 1312 - Moore v. Winebrenner

Moore v. Winebrenner’s Empirical Analysis

927 F.2d 1312 · 1991

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
March 2015
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Gonzalez v. Ysleta Independent School District (1993), Aiken v. Policy Management Systems Corp. (1993)

28 federal appellate · 3 district ·

490199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Estelle v. Gamble · City of Canton v. Harris · Gregg v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the ‘reasonable steps' language in Orpiano derives from a mere negligence standard that has been repudiated by both [the Fourth Circuit] and the United States Supreme Court, and that the proper question is whether [the defendant] acted wantonly, obdurately, or with deliberate indifference to the pervasive risk of harm.” 927 F.2d at 1315 . . There is no “Equal Protection Clause” in the Fourth Amendment. . Plaintiffs' cited”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “we view the inferences to be drawn from the underlying facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.