Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 927 F.2d 14 - United States v. Batista-Polanco

United States v. Batista-Polanco’s Empirical Analysis

927 F.2d 14 · 1991

Citation profile

240
cited by 240 later decisions
7
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

185 federal appellate · 15 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 240 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably United States v. Sepulveda (1993), United States v. Ortiz (1992)

185 federal appellate · 15 district · 10 state decisions

18201991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3501 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Glasser v. United States · Jackson v. Denno · Rhode Island v. Innis · Roviaro v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 240 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he evidence may be entirely circumstantial, and need not exclude every hypothesis of innocence; that is, the factfinder may decide among reasonable interpretations of the evidence.”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]t runs counter to human experience to suppose that criminal conspirators would welcome innocent nonparticipants as witnesses to their crimes.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “we cannot accept the hypothesis that participants in a distribution scheme would permit a noncontributing interloper to remain for an extended period of time in a small apartment while their conspicuous criminal conduct continued unabated.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.