United States v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis
927 F.2d 170 · 1991
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably United States v. Mullins (1992), United States v. Arutunoff (1993)
25 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1366 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Granito v. United States · United States v. Daughtrey · United States v. White · United States v. Gordon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n cases that result in damage to or loss or destruction of property, . . . [t]he language of the Victim and Witness Protection Act (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he fact that the goals of the Act may be thwarted by denying lost income restitution does not authorize us to ignore the plain language of the statute. Congress is clearly capable of authorizing restitution for lost income when it chooses to do so. See 18 U.S.C. § 3663 (b)(2). Despite this fact, it has not included lost income in the type of restitution that may be ordered in property cases and, unless and until it amends the statute to include lost income, courts may not order such restitution in property cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.