Justice Tv v. Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company’s Empirical Analysis
927 F.2d 503 · 1991
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 9 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation (1997), Packard
6 federal appellate · 9 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Relies on Zahn v. International Paper Co. · Snyder v. Harris · Ronzio v. Denver & R. G. W. R. · Lonnquist v. J. C. Penney Co. · Climax Chemical Co. v. C. F. Braun & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether state law or federal common law determines if the claims are separate and independent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.