Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 927 F.2d 551 - Johns v. Jarrard

Johns v. Jarrard’s Empirical Analysis

927 F.2d 551 · 1991

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
November 2014
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably Lama v. Borras (1994), Toole v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. (2000)

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

430199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman · First Virginia Bankshares v. Benson · Moore v. United States · Apcoa, Inc. v. Fidelity National Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[We] view the challenged instructions as part of the entire charge, in view of the allegations of the complaint, the evidence presented, and the arguments of counsel, to determine whether the jury was misled and whether the jury understood the issues.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that a reasonable jury could not arrive at a contrary verdict.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in the light and with all reasonable inferences most favorable to the party opposed to the motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.