Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 927 F.2d 559 - Warren v. Crawford

Warren v. Crawford’s Empirical Analysis

927 F.2d 559 · 1991

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
December 2017
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Turnes v. Bank Na (1994), Batey v. Stone (1994)

32 federal appellate · 2 district ·

440199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Perry v. Sindermann · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Bishop v. Wood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a false statement, (2) of a stigmatizing nature, (3) attending a governmental employee's discharge, (4)[was] made public, (5) by the governmental employer, (6) without a meaningful opportunity for an employee name clearing hearing.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must determine whether there is any genuine issue of material fact and whether the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. All evidence and reasonable factual inferences drawn therefrom are reviewed in the light most favorable to the party opposed to the motion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a public employee has a property interest in employment when that employee can be fired only for cause.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.