In Re D. Raymond Young and John C. Wride’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2014
4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Righetti · Southland Corp. v. United States · In re Keller · In Re Walter Kaslow and Uniform Product Code Council, Inc. (Uppc), Intervenor · In Re Berwyn E Etter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“what the combined teachings ... would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Hans Oetiker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.