NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Kamo'I Kamohoalii HUIHUI, a/k/a Edward Huihui, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Elizabeth STACK, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-15649.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Mar. 1, 1991.*
Decided March 5, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, No. CV-89-0902-SPK; Samuel P. King, Senior Judge, Presiding.
D. Hawaii
AFFIRMED.
Before FLETCHER, PREGERSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Kamo'i Kamohoalii Huihui appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action claiming entitlement to real property as heir to the monarchy of Hawaii. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291, and we review de novo. Love v. United States, 871 F.2d 1488, 1491 (9th Cir.1989).
In an unpublished order filed on April 3, 1990, the district court carefully considered Huihui's claims. We affirm the dismissal based on the analysis set forth in the district court's well-reasoned order.
The private party defendants request sanctions against Huihui for bringing this appeal. We conclude that sanctions are not appropriate. Accordingly, the appellees' request for attorneys fees and double costs is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for disposition without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, Huihui's and Stack's requests for oral argument are denied