Lane v. Nading’s Empirical Analysis
927 F.3d 1018 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Hudson v. Michigan · Samson v. California · Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. M Scott · District of Columbia v. Wesby · McClendon v. City of Columbia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e do not consider a consensus based on the decision of a single circuit and a handful of lower courts to be 'robust.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“controlling authority or a robust consensus of cases of persuasive authority”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.