Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
927 F.3d 1306 · 2019
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 101 · 35 U.S.C. § 282 · 35 U.S.C. § 285
Relies on Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l · Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. · Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership · Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership · Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While we do not read Aatrix to say that any allegation about inventiveness, wholly divorced from the claims or the specification, defeats a motion to dismiss, plausible and specific factual allegations that aspects of the claims are inventive are sufficient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“several ways in which its application of capturing, transferring, and publishing data was unconventional.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“well-understood, routine [and] conventional”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.