Jefferson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 450 So. 2d 217 - Holly v. Auld · 604 So. 2d 471 - Green v. State · 714 So. 2d 440 - White v. State · 700 So. 2d 370 - LB v. State · 453 So. 2d 1351 - SE FISHERIES v. Dept. of Nat. Resources
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Likewise, '[a] court cannot construe an unambiguous statute in a way which would extend, modify, or limit its express terms or its reasonable and obvious implications.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.