927 So. 2d 1079 - Denmark v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · 533 So. 2d 744 - Bryan v. State · 525 So. 2d 420 - Florida Bar v. Levey · 572 So. 2d 1346 - Nowitzke v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“on evidentiary issues. The obligation to represent a client zealously, however, is not unbounded. Counsel is an officer of the court and must comport himself or herself with the trial court's rulings. We are compelled to express our concern with the prosecutor's unwillingness to follow the trial court's rulings. Denmark, 927 So.2d at 1081 n. 1. I can only conclude that, unlike the Second District, the majority actually condones such behavior and would encourage prosecutors to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“And [Mr. Denmark] was thrown out of . . . school at age eleven when he phoned in a bomb threat, fair statement?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]lthough no curative instruction was requested or given, any such instruction would not have cured the error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.