927 So. 2d 1084 - Anthony v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 739 So. 2d 568 - Ramirez v. State · 874 So. 2d 1225 - Roberts v. State · 892 So. 2d 1014 - State v. West · 917 So. 2d 911 - Stancle v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Florida courts consistently interpreted Miranda to require that a person in custody be notified of the right to have counsel present during interrogation. See, e.g., Ramirez v. State, 739 So.2d 568 (Fla.1999) (summarizing that Miranda requires a defendant to be informed of his right to an attorney during questioning).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“argued that his own statements were the focal point of the trial, and that the error in admitting them was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because the bulk of the evidence against him was his own confession and its corroborating effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.