¶1Although the trial court in this case had jurisdiction of the parties in the subject matter, it appears from a review of the record that the injunction was entered under section 741.30, Florida Statutes (2005), instead of section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2005). The injunction is nevertheless supported by competent substantial evidence. Accordingly, we AFFIRM, without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek modification from the trial court.
927 So. 2d 171
Wray v. Harrell
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 28, 2006
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-04-28
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2010
2 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“Although the trial court in this case had jurisdiction of the parties in the subject matter, it appears from a review of the record that the injunction was entered under section 741.30, Florida Statutes (2005), instead of section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2005). The injunction is nevertheless supported by competent substantial evidence. Accordingly, we AFFIRM, without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek modification from the trial court.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Fuccio v. Durso
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2006-04-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →