Card v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
January 2014
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Riner v. Com. · 900 So. 2d 615 - Shiver v. State · 922 So. 2d 1046 - Belvin v. State · 929 So. 2d 4 - Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A driving record properly authenticated by the DHSMV does not seem to us to be testimonial because it is not accusatory and does not describe specific criminal wrongdoing of the defendant. Rather, it merely represents the objective result of a public records search. Driving records are kept in Florida for the public benefit and are not solely prepared for trial purposes. A driving record contains neither expressions of opinion nor conclusions requiring the exercise of discretion, and is not made or kept for law enforcement or trial purposes.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“prior testimony at a preliminary hearing, before a grand jury, or at a former trial; and . . . police interrogations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.